Still, colleges and universities use their athletic success to promote their school and entice potential applicants.
Student-athletes would be paid for this and all the additional benefits they provide for their schools.
Depending on the student-athlete’s income, those taxes could be high enough to reduce what they earn until they can barely cover tuition, according to John R.
Thelin in his article “Here's Why We Shouldn't Pay College Athletes.” Those who opposed paying college student-athletes say scholarships are the best option; there is no question as to what the scholarship money is going toward.
Student-athletes are the ones working hard out on the court and field.
Coaches might have a big effect on a team, but it is up to the athletes to get it done.College football and men’s basketball programs earn far more than any other athletic program, so these athletes would likely earn more as well.This may not be considered fair pay, but many of those who argue in support of paying college players point out that team popularity and consumers generally determine what is “fair.” These sports also tend to support other less popular sports that do not bring in a lot of money on their own.Since we’re in the heart of March Madness, now is a great time to debate whether college student-athletes should be paid or not.People who think college student-athletes should be paid often say the students’ names and images are used on products and in advertising, among other things, so they should receive some of the profits.Instead, they go to the coaches, athletic directors, and some administrators, reports Edelman.Student-athletes do not need to receive huge salaries like their coaches; rather, they could still be paid a reasonable amount relative to how much the program makes.Cash or a salary could be spent on wants rather than necessities, potentially leading the athletes into a debt they would not have with the benefit of a scholarship.Furthermore, those who debate against paying student-athletes say it would change the very nature of college athletics.In 2013 survey expert John Dennis found that 69% of the public is opposed to paying student-athletes.(This proposed payment would be in addition to the scholarships given in men’s football and basketball programs.) If scholarships were taken out of the deal, and only salaries were given, then it would be more fair and affordable for the university, right? If salaries were given, then these college student-athletes would have to pay taxes.