In his book “Logic, the Theory of Inquiry” he very clearly outlines the process of research.
In his book “Logic, the Theory of Inquiry” he very clearly outlines the process of research.Very reassuring for beginning researchers, he states that research follows a uniform structure, which applies to our everyday life as well as to science.
This means that qualitative researchers study things in their natural settings, attempting to make sense of or interpret phenomena in terms of the meanings people bring to them” (p. Special consideration is given to the researcher as person.
He or she is not the independent observer in a white coat – a picture that is often drawn when natural scientists are depicted.
Or can we only examine constructions of something that might be real, true and objective? If you were never introduced to philosophy of sence, recommended reads are the seminal works by Thomas Kuhn and Paul Feyerabend: The structure of scientific revolutions (Kuhn, (1962 /1996) and Against Methods (Feyerabend, 1975/2010).
For all readers with German language proficiency, a good read is the book by Wallach (2009) on the philosophical basic of science.
Kuhn shows that many of the great scientific discoveries were made by chance rather than by applying a rigid methodology.
Research Proposal Development - Qualitative Research Papers Examples
According to Kuhn, scientific knowledge is only true as long as we haven’t found a better truth.There are plenty of examples for this in our everyday life.Recently, I was looking for a long VGA cable to connect a laptop to a beamer. I looked in the cupboard where the cables are stored but could not find a long VGA cable.There are numerous famous examples where major discoveries were delayed or where observations were ignored because they did not fit prevalent theory and thus inhibiting progress and knowledge generation.When you are interested, take a look at the already mentioned books by Thomas Kuhn and Paul Feyerabend. As qualitative researcher, you go out into – whatever you consider to be the real world – observe and talk to people, interact with them aiming to understand what is important to your research participants and how they perceive the world.He became known as revolutionary scientists and most readers are likely to have heard about his famous methodological conclusion: “The only principle that does not inhibit progress is: Anything goes.” He called for methodological pluralism.A famous quote is: “Knowledge is not a series of self-consistent theories that converges towards an ideal view; it is rather an ever increasing ocean of mutually incompatible (and perhaps even incommensurable) alternatives, each single theory, each fairy tale, each myth.” After having set the stage by clarifying your position on what there is that can be discovered, you need to figure out whether a qualitative or quantitative approach is more appropriate for answering the kind of questions you are interested in.Thus, we can never be sure whether our knowledge is in fact objective or whether it is limited to what we are able to see now.The limitations may be of technical or cognitive nature.I asked a colleague and she then went together with me to the same cupboard and gave me a long VGA cable – a transparent one.I had looked for something black and therefore I did not see it.