The journal paper target is two in 2012 and two in 2013 with ABS 1 or 2 ranking.
To achieve this the publication process model can be followed when converting a dissertation into a journal article (Figure 2).
In relation to this journal productivity needs to be taken into account.
In terms of the forthcoming REF there is a need for four academic journal papers by November 2013, and this can be achieved by developing four dissertations into journal papers during 20 (Table 1).
This paper provides a “toolkit” that can be used by academics as part of a systematic approach to convert a dissertation into a journal article.
The paper considers a number of factors, and these include the quality of the dissertation, the authorship involved, journal ranking and selection, how dissertations differ from journal articles, reframing for publication, turning the dissertation into a publication, contents, seven rules, and conclusions.This has resulted in more competition and rigorous processes.In response to this academic staff need to follow a personal publication programme as outlined in this paper in the publication “toolkit” in order to develop good dissertations into rated journal articles.This approach has involved a fundamental thematic review of the literature concerning the conversion of dissertations into journal articles.From these sources pertinent approaches, processes, lessons, and guidance have been noted and analysed.Factors taken into account are the quality of the dissertation, the authorship involved, selection of appropriate journals, trimming the dissertation to the correct length for the journal, and developing the draft and submission to the target journal.The criteria involved in developing a dissertation into a journal paper are shown in Table 2.Table 3 shows the quality of a dissertation based on the percentage and award level.In terms of a dissertation being the right quality to form the basis of a journal paper a pass mark of 40–59% will probably not provide a dissertation that can be used.If this is one or greater, it is a positive factor and shows that the author has successfully taken papers from conference to journal.For an academic with 91 refereed conference papers and 90 refereed journal papers the conversion factor will equal 0.989 and can be considered to show good conversion.