Tags: Debt Vs Equity Financing Term PapersEssay On Health Is Wealth For Class 7Thesis Proposals AssumptionsIntroductory Paragraph With Thesis StatementEssay About MncsEssay Science Fiction Story
Feaver uses a first-person pronoun in a similar way to Flynn in “The Gun”, but to quite a different effect.She writes “I join in the cooking”, using the ideas of “joining in” – implying cooperation – and “cooking”, which is often regarded as a social activity, to create a sense of community.
However, the permanence of violence, death and their effects is a point of disagreement between the two poets, as is the extent to which violent acts can paradoxically ‘give life.’ Once you’ve identified a similarity or a contrast between the poems in terms of language use, explain in detail how that different use of rhyme, structure etc.
contributes to the similar or different way in which the poets convey the theme in the title.
In a similar vein, Flynn writes in “The Notorious Case of Robert the Painter” that “the killer caught the public imagination.” The verb “caught” implies a quick action, suggesting a similar sense of rush and excitement, and the idea of “catching the public imagination” (or the imagination in general) is often reserved for writers and artists, which suggests there may even be some art to violence.
In this respect, both poems demonstrate similar ideas of violence and its relationship to excitement.
The introduction should, of course, briefly lay out what your general argument will be during the essay without any language analysis or developed points.
One thing my teachers have emphatically told us not to do is state the obvious, e.g.“The poet uses many linguistic techniques.” That’s too vague even for an introduction, but giving examples of literary techniques and stating what effect they have in a few words will do the trick.You could structure your introduction by summarising the similarities and then differences between each poem, as below: In some senses, the two poems portray a similar attitude towards violence; in both, there is a certain degree of fascination by death and violence, as well as personal engagement with violence by the narrator.However, when looking at the two poems you can see although the subject matter a is the same there is some major differences.While reading Moss’s poem it reads more dry and dull almost like reading from a dictionary whereas Shakespeare’s when read almost feels as though it was meant for the reader to picture it in their mind like a movie....Although violent acts and attitudes towards them are sometimes presented using similar methods in the two poems, there seem to be more instances where the methods used contrast directly.The dichotomies of transience and permanence, and life in death and an ultimate end, which exist between the two poems indicate that they portray rather opposing attitudes to violence overall.This paragraph focuses more on grammar, although there is some discussion of word choice too.I begin by mentioning how the poems are similar but also different, which I do quite often because it adds some nice AO4 nuance.Phonological techniques are also used by the poet to create an impression of excitement; she writes “You trample fur and feathers.There’s a spring in your step…”, thus using repeated voiceless fricatives to convey the feeling of an excited rush.